99RIS AACE 2023

This blog is a part of the AACE/ GPC/ CMAA/ INCOSE Certification Preparation Course under the mentorship of Dr. Paul D. Giammalvo, CDT, CCE, MScPM


W5.0_YP_Cost Estimation by Ratio and Proportion

1. Problem Definition

We are considering the construction of a new storage tank, where one of the key factors is the development cost. Given the need for an early decision, there isn’t enough time to carry out a comprehensive and detailed engineering study. At this stage, the research will qualitatively determine the most appropriate method for estimating costs, utilizing historical data.

2. Development of feasible alternatives

In accordance with AACE RP No. 17R-97, the author is required to develop a class 5 estimate to fulfill the requirements of management.

Tabel 1: Class Estimate

3. Possible Solution / Alternative

Referring to Table 1, the recommended methods for generating a class 4 estimate include:

  • Capacity Factored
  • Parametric Models
  • Judgement
  • Analogy

In this instance, we will employ Capacity Factored Estimates (CFE) and Parametric Models. This approach involves estimating the cost of a new facility based on the cost of a comparable facility with known capacity and a similar production process (for example, both using batch processes), although the end products may differ. This method is based on the non-linear correlation between capacity and cost.

Tabel 2: Process Equipment Size Exponent (N) – N= 0.6 for Tank Vessels, Carbon Steel

We utilize historical data from our past contracts. As such, we employ Cost Indices, which are beneficial for estimating costs based on prices from different time periods rather than current ones. For example, if the known cost of equipment is based on prices from the year 1998, this cost should be adjusted to current values by multiplying it with the ratio of the current index to the 1998 base index, thereby updating the cost to reflect present day dollars.

4. Selection of Criteria

The outcome of the estimation process needs to align with the requirements set by Management, ensuring that the accuracy level meets expectations in relation to the actual costs incurred at the project’s conclusion.

5. Analysis and Comparison of the Alternatives

Tabel 3: Data

Tabel 4: Calculation Result using Process Equipment Size Exponent (N)

Since we are using 2020 data, and we want to calculate for 2024 project, we use Cost Indicies. For the ratio, we use The Big Mac Ratio.

Tabel 4: The Big Mac Index

Tabel 5: Current Cost Using The Big Mac Index

6. Selection and Preferred Alternatives

As shown at table 1, Class 4 estimation range is from -30% to + 50%.

Tabel 6: Class 4 Estimation

Based on the estimation result in Table 7, the Author proposed a class 5 estimate with the total investment cost is using P70 for preferred capacity of tank.

7. Performance Monitoring and the Post Evaluation of Result

The class 5 estimates purpose is only for the concept screening. If the management approve the concept screening, the Estimators then should complete the required project scope so that the level 2 or 3 estimate can be produced for bidding process.

References

  1. Module 08-4 Creating the Owners Cost Estimate (Top Down) (2015).
    Retrieved from http://www.planningplanet.com/guild/gpccar/creating-the-owners-cost-estimate
  2. AACE International Recommended Practice No. 17R-97
    Retrieved from http://www.anvari.net/Risk%20Analysis/17r-97.pdf
  3. AACE International Recommended Practice No. 59R-10
    Retrieved from https://fenix.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/downloadFile/1126518382175702/DEVELOPMENT%20OF%20FACTORED%20COST%20ESTIMATES_AACE%2059R-10.pdf
  4. W24_HI_Cost Estimating Method
    Retrieved from https://garudaaace2015.wordpress.com/2015/08/22/w24_hi_cost-estimating-method/
  5. Process Equipment Cost Estimating by Ratio and Proportion (2012)
    Retrived from https://www.pdhonline.com/courses/g127/g127content.pdf
  6. Sullivan, G. W., Wicks, M. E., & Koelling, C. P. (2014). Engineering economy 16th Edition. Chapter 3 – Cost-Estimation Techniques., page.91-122.
  7. W6_OAN_Equipment Factored Cost Estimates
    Retrieved from http://emeraldaace2017.com/2017/09/10/w6_oan_equipment-factored-cost-estimates/
  8. The Big Mac Index (2017)
    Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/content/big-mac-index


2 responses to “W5.0_YP_Cost Estimation by Ratio and Proportion”

  1. OK, Pak Yoga but how many times have you been told by Glenn Butts or Prof Bent Flyvbjerg about the DANGERS of giving point estimates? How many times are NASA and Flyvbjerg telling you to give RANGE ESTIMATES and be clear in communicating the ACCURACY, PRECISION, VALIDITY and RELIABILITY? And then you WONDER why so many of your projects finish LATE and/or OVER BUDGET?

    IF you want to get OTOBOSOR then you have GOT to break the BAD HABIT of “Given the need for an early decision, there isn’t enough time to carry out a comprehensive and detailed engineering study. ”

    What I tell big bosses when they give me that line of bullshit, I paraphrase the Basketball Coach John Wooden — “If you don’t give me the time to do it right, when will you have time to have me do it over again?”

    As long as you guys continue to allow the “Big Bosses” to ask you to ENABLE them to practice BAD HABITS then when the project runs late and/or over budget, do you think they will take the blame? Or will they try to pin the blame on YOU?

    This is why you need to put in place a ROBUST and ENFORCED Phase Gate Decision Making process and DOCUMENT what recommendation you were advising given the KNOWN SCOPE and what was the RANGE of COSTS and DURATIONS, then hold the DECISION MAKER ACCOUNTABLE for the decision they made. When you start to hold people ACCOUNTABLE for their DECISIONS then you will soon find them become much more CONSERVATIVE in their decisions.

    Go read this paper and learn about “OPTIMISM BIAS” and “STRATEGIC MISREPRESENTATION.” https://www.academia.edu/3365343/Over_Budget_Over_Time_Over_and_Over_Again_Managing_Major_Projects

    BR,
    Dr. PDG, Jakarta

    Like

  2. Pak Yoga, to produce class 5 and 4 estimates referring to the AACE estimate classification, you can use parametric estimates, one of them is capacity factored. To understand in more detail, I highly recommend you to read the development of the parametric estimation method at the following link.

    https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:659f53ad-a866-4253-beb5-a9e3f3289f48/datastream/OBJ/download

    In that thesis, you will found the hierarchy, history, use, limitations, advantages and disadvantages of each parametric estimation method are explained. After reading, please conclude which method is most suitable for our company?

    BR,
    Your TA

    Like

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started